Alcove Activities: Second Level: Explicating a Text, The Nineteenth-Century American
Back to Reading and Writing Alcove ◀
Second Level: Explicating a Text, The Nineteenth-Century American
Now use the excerpt below to explicate the thesis of the excerpt below and on the previous page, following these directions:
  1. State the main point of the paragraph in one or two sentences.

  2. Then elaborate on what you have paraphrased (“In other words,...”).

  3. Give examples of the meaning by tying it to concrete situations in the real world. (For example,...)

  4. Generate metaphors, analogies, pictures, or diagrams of the basic thesis to connect it to other meanings you already understand.


The Nineteenth-Century American

Background Information:
This excerpt is from the book, The American Mind, by the distinguished historian Henry Steele Commager.

In one realm the American was a conformist, and that was the realm of morals. Although he did not always observe them, he accepted without question the moral standards of the Puritans, and if a later generation was to find him repressed and inhibited, there is little evidence that he was conscious of his sufferings... Conformity and conventionalism in matters of morals sometimes assumed aggressive form, and the willingness to resign control of the whole field of culture to women combined with the tradition of Puritanism to encourage intolerance and justify censorship. Language was emasculated, literature expurgated, art censored. Piano legs were draped with pantalets, words like belly and breast dropped from polite conversation, the discussion of sex confined to men and obstetrics to women, while Shakespeare and Fielding joined French writers generally in disrepute. Early in the century a furor was raised when Hiram Powers exhibited his undraped “Greek Slave,” and at the end of the century Thomas Eakins, perhaps the greatest of American painters, was driven from the Pennsylvania Academy when he used male models in mixed classes. Dancing, plays, and mixed bathing came under the ban. Censorship of art and literature slid easily into censorship of morals, especially those having to do with love and drinking; modesty degenerated into Comstockery and the temperance movement into prohibition.


1. Statement of the thesis...
2. Elaboration of the thesis...
3. Exemplification of the thesis...
4. Analogy of the thesis...



Specimen Answer:

1. Statement of the thesis...
Nineteenth-century Americans were unquestioning puritanical conformists— especially the women, who came to dominate a strict conventional sexual morality and impose it on all facets of culture and art.
2. Elaboration of the thesis...
In other words, morality was dictated by sexual convention. Violations of sexual conventions were kept secret. Intolerance and censorship were the rule. Dogmatic inflexibility was developed in every dimension of American life. This puritanical fanaticism led to violations of individual rights.
3. Exemplification of the thesis...
For example, “piano legs were draped with pantalets, words like belly and breast dropped from polite conversation...and at the end of the century Thomas Eakins, perhaps the greatest of American painters, was driven from the Pennsylvania Academy when he used male models in mixed classes... Dancing, plays, and mixed bathing came under the ban.”
4. Analogy of the thesis...
People in nineteenth-century America perceived the world in largely childlike, simplistic terms. As with groups of children, dissent was ridiculed. Those who didn’t go along with the group were ostracized. Social hysteria and witch-hunts became common events. An unsophisticated worldview of cowboys versus Indians, good guys versus bad guys, became the rule. To this day, American political and social thinking continues to suffer from this same cultural narrowness of mind. Consider U.S. President Bush’s characterizing the world as divided into those who are “good” and those who are “evil.” Consider also his challenge to all countries in the world to decide whether they are “for us or against us,” implying that there is no other choice possible. Compare the comment of Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the Nobel laureate, who said, “If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being.”